FOREIGN CAPITAL AND DOMESTIC INVESTMENT IN UZBEKISTAN: EVIDENCE-BASED PRIORITIES FOR INVESTMENT POLICY
Annotatsiya
This paper examines the balance between foreign capital (FDI) and domestic investment in Uzbekistan’s industrial modernization. Evidence suggests that investment effectiveness depends on institutional quality and competitive discipline, whereas excessive incentives may entrench quasi‑monopolies and crowd out domestic capital. We argue for refocusing investment policy from inflow volumes to value‑added, localization and sustained outcomes, and outline priorities for mobilizing domestic resources (reinvestment, savings) alongside selective FDI.References
- Alfaro L., Chanda A., Kalemli-Ozcan Ş., Sayek S. FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets // Journal of International Economics. 2004. Vol. 64, No. 1. P. 89–112
- Javorcik B. S. Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages // American Economic Review. 2004. Vol. 94, No. 3. P. 605–627
- Aitken B. J., Harrison A. E. Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela // American Economic Review. 1999. Vol. 89, No. 3. P. 605–618
- Harrison A., Rodríguez-Clare A. Trade, foreign investment, and industrial policy for developing countries // Handbook of Development Economics. 2010. Vol
- Amsterdam: Elsevier. P. 4039–4214. 5. Rodrik D. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007
- Chang H.-J. Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism. London: Bloomsbury, 2008
Yuklab olishlar
Yuklab olish ma’lumotlari hali mavjud emas.